The Year They Burned the Books

The Year They Burned the Books[Ebook] ➯ The Year They Burned the Books ➮ Nancy Garden – Heartforum.co.uk Word of the YearThey Merriam Webster Our Word of the Year foris theyIt reflects a surprising fact even a basic term a personal pronoun can rise to the top of our data Although our lookups are often dr They Burned PDF Æ Word of the YearThey Merriam Webster Our Word of the Year foris theyIt reflects a surprising fact even a basic term a personal pronoun can rise The Year PDF \ to the top of our data Although our lookups are often driven by events in the news, the dictionary is also a primary resource for information about Year They Burned PDF Ç language itself, and the shifting use of they has been the subject of increasing study and commentary in recent years The Word Of The Year Is They NPR NOEL KING, HOST Every year, Merriam Webster picks a word of the year For , the honor goes to the word they More and , it s being used as a singular gender nonbinary pronoun They named as Merriam Webster dictionary s word The nonbinary pronoun they has been named Merriam Webster s word of the year They Is the Word of the Year, Merriam Webster The word of the year, the dictionary publisher said, is based on data Searches for the definition of they on the publisher s website and apps increased bypercent inover theMerriam Webster s Word of the YearThey M erriam Webster announced Tuesday that it has chosen they as theword of the year The singular they is a pronoun used to refer to a person whose gender identity is nonbinary, aYear of the Nurse and the MidwifeWHO They are often, the first and only point of care in their communities The world needsmillionnurses and midwives if it is to achieve universal health coverage byThat s why the World Health Assembly has designatedthe International Year of the Nurse and the Midwife Join WHO and partners including, the International Confederation of Midwives ICM , International CouncilYear of the Pig Personality and Fortune, Chineseis a Year of the Pig according to the Chinese zodiac, and it s an Earth Pig year In Chinese astrology, each year belongs to a Chinese zodiac animal according to theyear cycle Recent years of the Pig include andPig Years The Pig occupies the twelfth position in the Chinese zodiac after the Dog, and before the Rat If you wereChinese New YearYear of the Rat Chinese New Year is celebrated bythan % of the world It s the most important holiday in China and to Chinese people all over Here areinteresting facts that you probably didn t know about Chinese New Year Get the facts What s lucky in the year of the Rat Calendar When is Chinese New YearDays Jan th th Little Year Preparations for the new year begin on JanuaryYear of the MonkeyFortune, Chinese Zodiac In career, they will have golden chances to get promotions and higher salary this year It is advised them to get on well with colleagues and leaders all the time As for wealth, they should reduce their consumption and avoid being too extravagant In love and relationship, single male Monkeys will attract the opposite sex on social occasions and may fall in love with someone Year of the Dog, Chinese Zodiac DogFortune However, in the next half year, they may get success in work and get the appreciation from a higher up Don t give up any chance and make a full preparation In the financial aspect, this year is not a so good year for Dogs to invest They may face financial difficulties in the first several months, but things will become positive in lateas long as avoiding any risky investments Dogs.

They Burned PDF Æ In Remembrance: Nancy Garden.

The Year They Burned the Books PDF/EPUB Í They Burned
    Import EPUB to the Program Import EPUB for information about Year They Burned PDF Ç language itself, and the shifting use of they has been the subject of increasing study and commentary in recent years The Word Of The Year Is They NPR NOEL KING, HOST Every year, Merriam Webster picks a word of the year For , the honor goes to the word they More and , it s being used as a singular gender nonbinary pronoun They named as Merriam Webster dictionary s word The nonbinary pronoun they has been named Merriam Webster s word of the year They Is the Word of the Year, Merriam Webster The word of the year, the dictionary publisher said, is based on data Searches for the definition of they on the publisher s website and apps increased bypercent inover theMerriam Webster s Word of the YearThey M erriam Webster announced Tuesday that it has chosen they as theword of the year The singular they is a pronoun used to refer to a person whose gender identity is nonbinary, aYear of the Nurse and the MidwifeWHO They are often, the first and only point of care in their communities The world needsmillionnurses and midwives if it is to achieve universal health coverage byThat s why the World Health Assembly has designatedthe International Year of the Nurse and the Midwife Join WHO and partners including, the International Confederation of Midwives ICM , International CouncilYear of the Pig Personality and Fortune, Chineseis a Year of the Pig according to the Chinese zodiac, and it s an Earth Pig year In Chinese astrology, each year belongs to a Chinese zodiac animal according to theyear cycle Recent years of the Pig include andPig Years The Pig occupies the twelfth position in the Chinese zodiac after the Dog, and before the Rat If you wereChinese New YearYear of the Rat Chinese New Year is celebrated bythan % of the world It s the most important holiday in China and to Chinese people all over Here areinteresting facts that you probably didn t know about Chinese New Year Get the facts What s lucky in the year of the Rat Calendar When is Chinese New YearDays Jan th th Little Year Preparations for the new year begin on JanuaryYear of the MonkeyFortune, Chinese Zodiac In career, they will have golden chances to get promotions and higher salary this year It is advised them to get on well with colleagues and leaders all the time As for wealth, they should reduce their consumption and avoid being too extravagant In love and relationship, single male Monkeys will attract the opposite sex on social occasions and may fall in love with someone Year of the Dog, Chinese Zodiac DogFortune However, in the next half year, they may get success in work and get the appreciation from a higher up Don t give up any chance and make a full preparation In the financial aspect, this year is not a so good year for Dogs to invest They may face financial difficulties in the first several months, but things will become positive in lateas long as avoiding any risky investments Dogs."/>
  • Hardcover
  • 256 pages
  • The Year They Burned the Books
  • Nancy Garden
  • English
  • 08 March 2017
  • 9780374386672

10 thoughts on “The Year They Burned the Books

  1. Cece (ProblemsOfaBookNerd) says:

    TW: Homophobia, homophobic slurs, attempted suicide

    I read Nancy Garden's Annie On My Mind about a year ago and really loved it, so when this re-release of another of her books popped up on Netgalley, I requested it immediately. This was originally released in 1999, and sadly I think this book should maybe be left in the past.

    On a base level, I don't think this was well written. It was disastrously bad at telling over showing, to the point that for a while at the beginning I was considering just DNF-ing and moving on. Despite the fact that the characters in this book are mostly high school seniors (so between 17 and 18 years old) they were written more like 14-year-olds. Yes, the subjects they were dealing with were big, mature ones, but the characters themselves reacted to things far below their age level and it was frustrating. The dialogue was really stilted and unnatural. Overall, on just writing alone, I don't think this book excelled.

    But I do have a deeper issue with the story and how it ended. Without spoiling specific details, there is a big push for love the sinner, hate the sin ideology and I refuse to accept stories that treat this as acceptable. There is no loving the sinner if you hate who they are because there is no sin to hate. If you don't like that a person is gay, you are homophobic. If you say you try to love that person despite their gayness, then you are a homophobe. It is that simple.

    Almost the entire conclusion of this book was about how others can deal with and accept the gayness of their friends or loved ones by trying to love them in spite of it. It's a deeply harmful message to send, and I was upset by it. My gayness is not a choice, and it is not a part of me you can remove from the rest and choose to disapprove of. It is an essential part of who I am and if you don't like it, you're a toxic person. And also *ding ding ding* a homophobe! Congrats on that. I was upset by the fact that these were the satisfying conclusions characters were reaching by the end of the story. The big takeaway is that everyone can disagree and still have a healthy debate.

    Well, my identity is not a debate. And I won't have a civil conversation about it with someone who doesn't like it.

    But moving on from that, I think that anyone who is still considering going into this book should go in with huge warnings. This is a book about queer teens written in the 1990s, and it does not shy away from the homophobia or intense bullying they face. The homophobic slurs were constant to the point of being overwhelming. It isn't easy at almost any step of the way. This is not a mark against the book, just a warning for those who are considering reading it. If you have a hard time reading about characters dealing with intense homophobia, I would steer clear. Also there is a LOT of religious morality happening here, which did feel incredibly relevant (a character starts a committee to get the moral standards of the community back to how it used to be in the good old days) but is another thing to be aware of going in.

    There is also a character who is suicidal for a portion of this book. I don't feel that his mental well-being was considered nearly enough, and I was left very concerned with the book's perspective on depression.

    Finally, I would like to say that I thought this book did do a fair job of depicting questioning teens in a way I hadn't seen in a while. Jamie and her friend Terry both begin this book, as they describe it, as Maybes - maybe gay, maybe straight. No, they do not have an in-between option (eyyy bisexuality), but that's a whole other issue I'm not going to get into. They do go through a full process in the book of reconciling their Maybes as more of a definitely. While I wouldn't necessarily recommend this to questioning teens - just due to the overwhelming homophobia and bullying - I appreciated the focus questioning as part of the coming out process.

    Overall, I had too many issues with this book to consider giving it any higher than a 2/5. I think it is incredibly dated, full of harmful messages, and ultimately poorly written.

  2. Greyson | Use Your Words says:

    Thank you to Netgalley for providing me an advanced reader copy in exchange for my honest review.

    Trigger Warnings: (view spoiler)[Homophobia, homophobic slurs, violence, fear of sexual assault.
    (hide spoiler)]

  3. ✧ k a t i e ✧ says:

    People, no matter what they believe or what their differences are, have to be able to live together without hurting each other.

    I loved this book a lot more than what I was expecting to. I originally picked it up so I could catch up on my arcs (even though I don't know if I should consider this an arc since it was published years ago), but I really enjoyed it in the end.

    This book follows Jamie, an editor-in-chief on her school's newspaper. After writing an editorial piece on making condoms available at school, it creates a divide between the school and the town.

    I really liked Jamie. I really liked how she stood up for her views and for her actions. She never gave up on reporting the truth. I also really liked how you see her accept her sexuality over the course of the story. But my favorite character was Terry. I thought he was really funny and an overall great character. What I really admired about him though was how much he respected other people's boundaries. He was very understanding and patient.

    This book deals heavily with censorship and homophobia. The book also touches on free speech vs hate speech and prejudice. And Nancy Garden doesn't shy away from the topics. And with these topics being discussed, you really get into the debates. I found myself getting riled up at the logic in some of the arguments, which was something I didn't expect to happen. Even though this was originally written nearly two decades ago, there are still topics and debates that are still discussed to this day.

    Though I did enjoy this book, there was something that I didn't like. Early on in the book, Jamie gets invited to a debate at one of the churches in the town after the article was published. I was excited to read about this debate, even though it's an argument that is stated repetitively, I was excited to see an actual debate going on. But that part total gets skipped over. Instead we hear about what happened through Jamie's journal. I would've really loved to see how it went down instead of reading a little summary from her journal.

    Something that did confuse me was the cover. On the new cover, there is a guy standing in front of a girl. Now I am assuming that this is Jamie and Terry. But why is Terry standing infront of Jamie? Jamie is the main character who we follow, so why is she standing behind him? Even in the original cover she is front and center. This is something that didn't affect my rating but I noticed it and was genuinely confused.

    I really liked this book. It covers extremely important and relevant topics. And is one that a lot more people should read.

  4. PinkAmy loves books, cats and naps says:

    The late Nancy Garden was a trailblazer is writing mainstream YA LBGT themed books beginning in the 1980s with ANNIE ON MY MIND, when I wasn’t much older than a teen. Her books speak to an era where even in the most liberal schools, kids were routinely bullied for being gay, parents often kicked gay kids into the streets and LGBT suicide was rampant. While these circumstances are still true in pockets in the USA and in parts of the world, we’ve also made progress. When THE YEAR THEY BURNED THE BOOKS was written, the dream was civil partnerships and perhaps adoption. Now same sex marriage and couples adopting are law, yet we still face discrimination.

    THE YEAR THEY BURNED BOOKS feels stale. Stale writing. Stale attitudes. Stale characters. Gay characters feel lucky that straight people will still be their friends, reinforced by their parents. Jamie, the main character, embraces her best friend calling her a sinner and an abomination. I felt sad and angry, yet hopeful for the progress we’ve made.

    Don’t read THE YEAR THEY BURNED BOOKS if you’re looking for a well-written, timely story about censorship. You’ll be disappointed. Read this book because it accurately depicts how difficult the struggle and far we’ve come.

  5. Laura says:

    When I studied journalism, in college, this was before personal computers became common. There were computers in the work room, where we could enter our stories, but these were before the mouse, and you had to code bolds, and italics, and fun stuff like that. This was before what became known as Desktop Publishing, so all the text were printed out and pasted onto the sheet, and then sent off to the print shop to put together.

    I bring this up, because, kids-these-days™ probably think all the discussions about layout and printing and such might seem out of date, and since this book was written in the 90s, it does feel a bit out of date. It was before the Internet had become so big, before Wikipedia, before most of the websites that are out there today. That is why the kids, in this book, have to go to the library to research newspapers. It seems like another world, and yet, it was less then a quarter century ago.

    But, while the technology might be old fashioned, the message of this book, is, unfortunately still around, that there is a group of conservatives who feel they have to impose their brand of morality on the rest of the world.

    And their version of morality says that teens should not have sex, should not be gay, and should not even know about either sex, or homosexuality, because that will protect them.

    I wish I could say the fight is old, and doesn't happen any more, but it does.

    There is a great line in the book, after the majority of parents vote to not offer sex education or certain books in the library.


    The opinion of the majority is important, Mr. Just said. But the majority must never be allowed to tyrannize the minority–nor must the minority be allowed to tyrannize the majority.


    Great book, though it started a little slow. By the time I got half way through my heart was breaking for the closeted teens, and their fight with the family-values parents.

    If you want to read other books with teens, censorship, and morality minded parents, I would suggest Americus.


    Thanks to Netgalley for making this book available for an honest review.

  6. kb says:

    This had a very interesting premise, of fighting for new ideas and encouraging openmindedness within a community, and the characters were developed in such ways that readers can easily relate to. However, it was not as groundbreaking as I expected it to be, perhaps due to the fact that there are more diverse books nowadays. Still, would recommend to those who are hesitant to try YA lit that tackles sexuality.

  7. Heather says:

    After reading some disappointing books to review, I was expecting that to be the case for this book too. But I was wrong! This is a re-release of the book The Year They Burned the Books, originally written in the mid 90s. But this does not feel dated at all! (Though maybe the publisher edited it, I don't know) This story fits so well with a lot of the conflict between the American parties right now, so I found myself being enraged and saddened at times throughout the book. This is such a strong LGBT book that also focuses on all sides of a view point, even if some sides are more disagreeable.

    Definitely check this book out!

  8. Lydia says:

    Garden is an author noted for her LGBT writings, and this particular novel strikes to the heart of everyone who believes in the First and Second Amendments. Jamie Crawford has worked hard to become the editor-in-chief of her school newspaper. She truly believes a school paper should cover the issues relevant to the school and the community. When a new person is elected to the school committee, who believes that the new health ed curriculum and the school's policy of distributing condoms is immoral, Jamie who has already addressed the issue in the school newspaper comes under fire.

    the most powerful scene in the novel is when the fundamentalist stage a bonfire on Halloween night, burning the books they deem as immoral and inappropriate.

    The concept of burning books is absolutely obscene to me! Garden, however, constructs a story which will engage young adults to consider what life could be like in an environment where they are deprives of access to new ideas, philosophy, and extreme disc rumination, no matter what the criteria might be.

    I highly recommend this book and encourage teachers to incorporate it into their teaching curricula.

  9. Isaiah says:

    I got an ARC in return for an honest review from NetGalley.

    One of the first books I read with a lesbian character was Annie on my Mind. That was over ten years ago, but I will never forget the name of Nancy Garden. That book opened so many doors and help a great deal of people over the years. It is a classic like no other.

    This book, while not as groundbreaking read in 2017, was still a book I appreciated. It opened the idea that morality and education are not mutually elusive, but that at times they had to be held apart. This is a lesson that is very difficult for some people to grasp as it is hard to put your own views on hold to address an issue. That was seen on both sides of the issues of condom distribution and “homosexuality”. The MC was a girl that was not sure of her own sexuality, but had very passionate views about newspapers and freedom of speech. That was pretty interesting to me. The focus was not on the sexuality of the character developing, but instead on how others focused on that instead of the real issues at hand. Jamie was clearly struggling with it, but the book didn’t rehash every little thought she had about the subject, it was a background plot. That was something I am very grateful for. Most YA gay books in the 90’s and early 2000’s focused pretty much exclusively on “am I gay?” and first love stories. The way the sexuality was handled called to mind “the personal is political”. It taught the kids a lesson that your sexuality is a thing that others will care about more than you do at times. It was wonderfully done.

    I don’t understand how often homosexuality was spelled completely out in the text. I came out only a few years after this book was published, but not once was I asked if I was a homosexual. I was called a homo, a queer, a faggot, and more. Yet, the full clinical term of homosexual was still used repeatedly. It made the book feel a bit disjointed and too held back. It made the dialogue clunky.

    This is a book better read in the context of the time it was written as it has not held up wonderfully to technological advances or to even societal advances, which I am very thankful for. This may not be the classic that Annie on My Mind was, but this is a book I will point out to others as a great example of books allowing sexuality to fall to the back burner in YA queer literature.

    To see more reviews check out https://mibookreviews.wordpress.com/

  10. Jessica White says:

    Okay so I have a few issues with this book.
    1) When main character, Jamie, is talking to her parents the author refers to them (in Jamie's mind) as Mr. Crawford and Mrs. Crawford instead of Mom and Dad.
    2) This is not actually about book burning but it is about censorship.
    3) It deals with A LOT of controversy, such as LGBT issues and condom distribution.
    4) IT IS SO OUTDATED.

    I understand the need for a book like this, especially in the LGBT community.
    I'm sure in 1999 (when this book was published) it was better suited for that audience, but I feel as a whole our outlook has changed quite a bit, whether that be better or worse, I'm not sure.

    The basis of the book is a school newspaper editorial written in response to the school nurses distributing condoms to students on Friday in an attempt to promote safer sex. The editorial was pro-condom, whereas the op-ed was supposed to counteract the editorial. However, the op-ed was never written and caused quite a stir in the new school committee.
    This created an excuse for school board member, Lisa Buel, to create a group through her church called Families for Traditional Values (FTV), which is against basically EVERYTHING. This group doesn't agree with the condom distribution, the sex education curriculum, or homosexuality.
    The school paper catches wind and begins trying to counteract FTV with a renegade newspaper, one that cannot be shut down if the school doesn't agree with what they are publishing.
    There is so much drama between the two parties (FTV and the school paper committee).

    This book kind of irked me, far more than it probably should have.
    I understand the need for more LGBT books.
    I understand the need to stop censorship.
    I understand what this book was trying to do, but it was so extreme.
    It really bothered me, and I apologize to anyone who disagrees with me.
    I tried to keep my mind as open as possible, but I just could not handle it.

    Thanks to NetGalley for providing me a copy of The Year They Burned the Books

    This review and more can be found at A Reader's Diary!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *