Robin Hood



Robin HoodWhat Emerges Very Clearly Is The Extraordinary Power And Diversity Of The Material Again And Again The Reader Is Encouraged To Look At Well Known Works In A Fresh And Invigorating Way Or To Explore Unknown But Fascinating Areas Knight Is Open Minded And Generous I Find It All Very Persuasive Professor Douglas Gray, University Of Oxford By No Means Indifferent To The Romantic Lore Of The Myth Of The Outlaw, Stephen Knight Here Provides An Analysis Of Robin Hood That Is At Once Sympathetic And Critical, Warmly Humane And Politically Astute And Remarkably Thorough This Excellent Book Will Fascinate And Instruct All Who Have Responded To The Enduring Fantasy Of Noble Lawlessness Professor Robert Lee Patterson, Yale UniversityEverybody Has Heard Of Robin Hood, But Very Few Know About The Wealth Of Materials Which Record And Develop The Tradition That Sustains The Myth In This Book Stephen Knight Details And Analyses The Entire Phenomenon Of The Outlaw, His Resistance To Authority, And How Successive Ages Have Interpreted HimKnight Shows How In The Late Middle Ages Robin Hood Was Seen Simply As An Opponent Of Centralized Law, While The Elizabethans Gentrified Him To Support The Aristocracy And To Oppose A Corrupt Catholic Church, And Then At The Restoration He Came To Personify Treason Against An Anointed King To Walter Scott, Robin Was A Saxon Freedom Fighter, But For Keats He Was A Vision Of An Imaginatively Freer Time Tennyson And The Georgian Poets Found In Their Hero A Symbolic Escape From Oppressive Modernity, While Hollywood, At Its Most Vigorous And Elitist Made Robin Hood A Doubtful Figure Of Democracy More Recently He Has Focused Forms As Disparate As Disney Comedy And The Historical Novel, As Well As Television Versions Ranging From The Radical Mystical To Feminist FarceMost Accounts Of Robin Hood Merely Retell Stories Or Speculate Upon The Original Bandit S Identity But Knight S New Study, Based On Wide And Sophisticated Literary And Sociocultural Research, Is The First Complete Analytic Account Of This Major Mythic Figure, The English Outlaw Hero Who Has Symbolized Many Forms Of Resistance To Authority Around The World For Over Five Hundred Years

Is a well-known author, some of his books are a fascination for readers like in the Robin Hood book, this is one of the most wanted Stephen Thomas Knight author readers around the world.

✑ Robin Hood pdf ✓ Author Stephen Thomas Knight – Heartforum.co.uk
  • Paperback
  • 308 pages
  • Robin Hood
  • Stephen Thomas Knight
  • English
  • 20 May 2019
  • 063119486X

10 thoughts on “Robin Hood

  1. Samuel Valentino says:

    There is a lot that is good about this book I learned a lot about both ancient andmodern versions of the legend Thomas Love Peacock s Maid Marian is a book I d never have heard of were it not for this book Also, his emphasis that there is not a canonical Robin Hood story, like Le Morte d Arthur is to King Arthur That actually made me likemodern versions a lot better Anyone is free to add to the story in any way they want an especially good example of this is Will in Scarlet There is a lot that is good about this book I learned a lot about both ancient andmodern versions of the legend Thomas Love Peacock s Maid Marian is a book I d never have heard of were it not for this book Also, his emphasis that there is not a canonical Robin Hood story, like Le Morte d Arthur is to King Arthur That actually made me likemodern versions a lot better Anyone is free to add to the story in any way they want an especially good example of this is Will in Scarlet by Matthew Cody, a book I highly recommend.However, you know when I start the review off that way, there has to be a however The author, while acknowledging that there are a lot of different ways of seeing Robin Hood, apparently has his ONE WAY of seeing him, as an anti authority figure I m not saying that Robin Hood can t be viewed as such, it s just that every other consideration in the book is measured by how Robin s traits relate to this one identity Any deviation is regarded as gentrification and, lest this seem an ambiguous term, he even adds enfeebling to it on one occasion.Muchinformative was his discussion about Robin s role In some he is a leader, in others a follower, and in some others a buffoon I found that sort of interpretation muchinteresting than how anti authoritarian Robin would be, especially from a literary point of view.And now the biggest critique He says literally almost nothing about robbing from the rich and giving to the poor Okay, so he makes the case that that element is not in the original ballads I myslef would say not stressed, that is, butabout that in a minute Assuming that is true, you would think at some point, as the author is moving forward in time through Robin interpretations, that it would come up SOMEWHERE But the only place he mentions it is earlier in the book, and that to say it wasn t part of it at that time Ya know, when you get to the 20th century if not WAAAAY sooner, thanks to Parker s 17th century Robin Hood , even if you don t like it since it s not anti authoritarian, the author could at least talk about it.For me, I noticed the omission mainly because it does show the author s bias The big Robin Hood story that historians like to point out, because of its antiquity, is the Gest of Robin Hood True, there s no robbing from the rich scenes and distributing to the unfortunate in the poem However, the very last line of the poem is For he was a good outlaw, and did the poor much good For me, I ll acknowledge that the original didn t contain our 21st century ideas of wealth distribution On the other hand, in the main story it ends with his concern for the poor I m no Robin Hood scholar, but I d bet that it didn t make it into the main story because archery and robbing corrupt abbots is a lotfun to hear than charitable distribution Just from a story telling point of view.But that rant aside, a well written book, with a lot of scholarship behind it I may have strong views about it, but it was definitely a good intro to a subject I knew little of

  2. Josie says:

    Really comprehensive Knight explores all aspects of the legend from the earliest ballads to the latest at the time the book was written films, theories and themes He makes obvious that he doesn t believe Robin Hood was a real person, but unlike the other Robin Hood book I m reading at the moment, he doesn t just leave out the aspects that challenge his stance instead he discusses them at length.

  3. Stephen Basdeo says:

    A good read, and certainly must be given credit for making the post medieval Robin Hood tradition a legitimate area of study The complete study , however, is nowhere near as complete as its title suggests There appears to be a large hole, particularly in respect to early 18th century literature.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *