[Read] ➪ Über die spezielle und die allgemeine Relativitätstheorie By Albert Einstein – Heartforum.co.uk A handsome annotated edition of Einstein's celebrated book on relativityAfter completing the final version of his general theory of relativity in November 1915 Albert Einstein wrote Relativity Intende spezielle und MOBI î A handsome annotated edition of Einstein's celebrated book on relativityAfter completing the final version of his general theory of relativity in November Albert Einstein wrote Relativity Intended for a popular audience ~~die spezielle und die allgemeine PDF \ ~~ the book remains one of the most lucid explanations of the special and general theories ever written This edition of Einstein's celebrated book features an authoritative ~~Über die PDF or ~~ English translation of the text along with commentaries by Hanoch Gutfreund and Jrgen Renn that examine the evolution of Einstein's thinking and cast his ideas in a modern context Providing invaluable insight into one of the greatest scientific minds of all time the book also includes a uniue survey of the introductions from past editions covers from selected early * die spezielle und PDF ↠ * editions a letter from Walther Rathenau to Einstein discussing the book and a revealing sample from Einstein's original handwritten manuscript.

**spezielle und MOBI î ** Newtonion mechanics was no longer enough to reconcile the laws of classical mechanics with the laws of the electromagnetic field This led to the development of his special theory of relativity He ** die spezielle und die allgemeine PDF \ ** realized however that the principle of relativity could also be extended to gravitational fields and with his subseuent theory of gravitation in he published a

- Paperback
- 328 pages
- Über die spezielle und die allgemeine Relativitätstheorie
- Albert Einstein
- 06 June 2014 Albert Einstein
- 9780691191812

Albert Einstein 1879 1955 in this book introduces to the general reader his theory of relativity the special and the general theoryWe see that special relativity which has emerged from the Maxwell Lorentz theory of electromagnetic phenomena shows that the laws of science appear to be the same for all moving observers regardless of their speed all in the absence of gravityOn the other hand in general relativity which can be considered Einstein's theory of gravity we understand that the laws of science ought to be the same for every observer no matter how they are moving In general relativity gravitation is a result of the curvature of the four dimensional space time continuum Einstein refers us to Hermann Minkowski's 1864 1909 four dimensional world and states how important Minkowski’s one of Einstein’s teachers idea was for the development of his theory of relativitySo what did these moving and stationary observers notice Their pocket watches that were perfectly synchronized at first recorded a different time after their observation was complete Some dials were ahead and others behind So time is relative not absolute The book does not concentrate only on science but is also a tiny bit philosophical The writing is simple straightforward and easy to understand although at first the theory is somewhat complex but at the end of the day easier to understand than visualize It's difficult to visualize three dimensions let alone four Einstein's intention in writing this book is to present the special and general theory of relativity to the broader public with simplified examples and euations Einstein gives a lot of recognition to his predecessors such as Euclid Newton Galilei and Gauss and does not overthrow or disregard their science theories and laws but rather upgrades them I am astonished at Einstein's capability on how he utilizes the available mathematical euations which he modifies and adapts so well to suit his revolutionary theoryWe also notice that in general relativity no point of view is important or preferred over any other point of view I wonder if we can extend this conclusion to other subjects Are all perceptions coming from different angles of euivalent importance This is something to keep in mind while considering other people’s points of view My five star rating is for the uality accuracy and importance of the theory

This is the copy that I wanted In his own words he describes conceptually the theory of special and general relativity He uses very clever and easy to understand theoretical and real situations to guide your understanding towards an omega point I bought this book at special price from here

I hope that no one will ask me what was this book about

Some years ago in France a book by Jean François Gautier appeared entitled Does the universe exist Good uestionWhat if the universe were a concept like cosmic ether or phlogiston or the conspiracy of the Elders of ZionPhilosophically Gautier’s arguments make senseThe idea of the universe as the totality of the cosmos is one that comes from the most ancient cosmographies cosmologies and cosmogonies But can one describe as if seeing it from above something within which we are contained of which we are part and from which we cannot exit Can there be a descriptive geometry of the universe when there is no space outside it on which to project it Can we talk about the beginning of the universe when a temporal notion such as “beginning” must refer to the parameter of a clock while the universe must be the clock of itself and cannot be referred to anything that is external to it Can we say as Eddington does that a hundred billion stars constitute a galaxy and a hundred billion galaxies constitute the universe when as Gautier observes while a galaxy is an observable object the universe is not and therefore we would be establishing an improper analogy between two incommensurable objects Can we postulate the universe and then study with empirical instruments this postulate as if it were an object Can a singular object exist surely the most singular of all that has as its characteristic that of being only a law And what if the story of the big bang were a tale as fantastic as the gnostic account that insisted the universe was generated by the lapsus of a clumsy demiurge Basically this criticism of the notion of the universe reiterates Kant’s criticism of the notion of the worldAfter all the cultivated person’s first duty is to be always prepared to rewrite the encyclopediaPS The reflections are directly borrowed from Umberto Eco's lectures but are genuine concerns of this reviewer too uestions are addressed to Einstein of course

PrefaceNote to the Fifteenth Edition Relativity Appendices1 Simple Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation2 Minowski's Four dimensional Space World3 The Experimental Confirmation of the General Theory of Relativitya Motion of the Perihelion of Mercuryb Deflection of Light by a Gravitational Fieldc Displacement of Spectral Lines towards the Red4 The Structure of Space according to the General Theory of Relativity5 Relativity and the Problem of SpaceBibliographyIndex

edit i wrote the 4 star review below before reading the fifth appendix i mean who could imagine that an appendix could change anything well this one did all the chapters in the body of the book are 2 or 3 pages Appendix V is a 20 page essay written 36 years after the rest of the book and just 3 years before einstein died it is a tour de force on the history philosophy and psychology i kid you not of the scientific understanding of empty space it was shocking thrilling amazing the book now gets 5 starscareful i think some editions don't have Appendix Voriginal 4 star reviewthe subtitle of this slim book is a clear explanation that anyone can understand but unfortunately i'm afraid that's far from true there's not too much math in the book but there is enough that anyone really needs to be replaced with any egghead but if you are already familiar with relativity this is a great book with lots of deep philosophical underpinnings as expounded my the man himself i found his writing style to be exuisite not too dry not too collouialthe treatment of special relativity is wonderfulbut trying to teach general relativity in 45 pages with no math is just too tall an order he even warns us as things start to get roughI am guilty of a certain slovenliness of treatment which as we know from the special theory of relativity is far from being unimportant and pardonable It is now high time that we remedy this defect; but I would mention at the outset that this matter lays no small claims on the patience and on the power of abstraction of the readerindeed the treatment of GR is in very broad strokes with rather obscure connections still uite enjoyable to find this readable text by one of my great heroes

Needs gods rolling dice

The aim of this book is to introduce people without a strong physics or even scientific background to the special and general theories of relativity theories that Einstein was the primary developer of Einstein assumes the reader has passes a university matriculation exam What that meant in the first half of the 20th Century I don't know but in practice what's reuired is the level of algebra I had by age 16 plus a smattering of mentions of the suare root of minus 1 I also found basic calculus useful for one section though it is possible to do without itFor the most part this book is excellent introducing the minimal amount of mathematics and formal language necessary to understand the most important and fundamental concepts of Einstein's theories in a way that is accessible whilst concise It might be possible to do it better with a bigger book a less formal style and a lot diagrams but it very interesting to get Einstein's uniue perspective as originator of the theories and insight into his thought processesA few sections are remarkable in contrast with the rest for being unclear The section on addition of velocities in special relativity leaves rather to the reader than anything else in the book mathematically and when I looked it up it turned out to be much easier to work out using basic calculus than algebraic division and the bit that wasn't clear was that a division of two euations was what was reuired This section could be skipped without losing much The remainder of the muddy sections come at the back end of the section on general relativity The simplest precise mathematical formulation of this theory is expressed using tensors and tensor algebra is way beyond what anybody encounters in standard school maths or physics curricula Einstein makes no attempt to explain it and in fact never shows the fundamental euation of general relativity This makes it very hard for him to explain how gravitational fields and space time interact which leads to the lack of clarity in the latter stages of this part of the book Things get easier and clearer again when he moves on to relativity and cosmologyThe final part of the book is a collection of appendices expanding on things discussed earlier on I reuired pen and paper to check the derivation of the Lorentz Transformations from first principles but this section could just be skipped if the maths bothers you it doesn't add a lot but it is interesting to see it if your algebra is up to itThe most rewarding thing for me since nothing here is completely new to me was listening to Einstein's voice He seemed to come at things from a viewpoint much generally philosophical than most present day physicists would discussing Kant Descartes and Hume for instance The section on the concept of empty space was fascinating he concludes that general relativity precludes this notion one cannot have space time without it containing fields What he means is fields of force the electromagnetic field gravitational field etc This implies the notion of a field being present even if its magnitude is zero which is a bizarre concept Modern uantum mechanics backs these ideas to the hilt and leads me to think that one of the most important areas of inuiry for fundamental physics as it stands is the connection between the classical idea of space time and the uantum idea of the vacuum The fundamental nature of both is obscure and in some sense they should be the same thingOverall this is an excellent introduction to special relativity and at least the conceptual underpinnings of general relativity if not of the full theory which really just can't be explained properly without knowledge of tensors

The theory of relativity is amazing and important but contrary to what the tagline says Einstein himself is probably not the best person to have explain it to you I read this class for Freshman Studies in college and I honestly have to admit that I wouldn't have gotten much of it without the significant aid of in depth lectures and classroom discussions This is not because the ideas themselves are too complex but because Einstein fails in his attempt to make his ideas understood to a layman I don't know what book you ought to read instead but there are certainly many alternatives of which some must be good Einstein does not assume any knowledge of physics but he does kind of glide over what his variables mean or where they come from and this makes it hard to grasp what the math means and how it fits in

This book by Dr Einstein is very well written though you will find the anatomy of sentences a little unusual Well this should not be a problem considering the theory's difficulty level Though the theory is very simple mathematically special theory of relativity I'm talking about but the case is reverse when it comes to understand it intuitively It defies the common sense And that's what the book is about It changes your outlook the way you see the nature and gives you a new and better understanding